Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn4p YDR001C PubMed external link Zähringer H et al., Mol Microbiol, 2000 Jan;35(2):397-406Zähringer H et al., Mol Microbiol, 2000 Jan;35(2):397-406 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Heat shock
Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Osmotic stress
PubMed external link Cameroni E et al., Cell Cycle, 2004 Apr;3(4):462-8Cameroni E et al., Cell Cycle, 2004 Apr;3(4):462-8 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c diauxic shift
PubMed external link Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1B Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate)
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 10 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 YPD 30.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator