Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YHR087W
|
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations) |
PubMed
Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1B |
Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate) |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
10 min shift to pH=8 |
PubMed
Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diamide exposure-45min |
PubMed
Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540 |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
SP1 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF triple mutant |
Positive |
SP1 |
YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) |