|
Regulation Reference(s)
The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YML128C
|
PubMed
Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl |
PubMed
Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD + 0,5M NaCl |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
10 min shift to pH=8 |
PubMed
Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diamide exposure-45min |
|
|
|