Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn4p YMR169C PubMed external link Navarro-Aviño JP et al., Yeast, 1999;():Navarro-Aviño JP et al., Yeast, 1999;(): Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A YPD medium, exponential phase; 2h incubation with 1M KCl
PubMed external link Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD + 0,5M NaCl
PubMed external link Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59Aranda A et al., Yeast, 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Acetaldehyde stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated for 1 h in YPD supplemented with 1 g/L acetaldehyde
PubMed external link Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium 39ºC (heat shock)
PubMed external link Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,19 generations)
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Sake mash on day 5
PubMed external link Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 10 min shift to pH=8
PubMed external link Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diamide exposure-45min
PubMed external link Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PLoS One, 2020;15(8):e0237540 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant Positive BY4741 YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant Positive BY4741 YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant Positive SP1 YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant Positive BY4741 YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator