PubMed
Forsburg SL et al., Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1989;():Forsburg SL et al., Annu Rev Cell Biol, 1989;():
N/A
N/A
S288c
N/A
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
SC medium; mid-log phase
PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9
Direct
Chip-on-chip
N/A
S288c
N/A
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression
Positive
N/A
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed
Schuurmans JM et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2008 Feb;8(1):26-34Schuurmans JM et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2008 Feb;8(1):26-34
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
CEN.PK113-7D
wt versus Tf overexpression 0.67 %YNB, 2% glucose and 0.1 M phtalic acid pH 5 30.C mid exp cells
PubMed
Musa M et al., Aging (Albany NY), 2018 Sep 17;10(9):2407-2427Musa M et al., Aging (Albany NY), 2018 Sep 17;10(9):2407-2427
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
Y258Â
Heat shock
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000
Direct
ChIP-exo
N/A
CEN.PK 113-5D
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct
ChIP-exo
N/A
CEN.PK 113-5D
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h