Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Hap4p YHR051W PubMed external link Trawick JD et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 May;12(5):2302-14Trawick JD et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 May;12(5):2302-14 Direct lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence Positive S288c 2% lactate 100mg/mL of b-aminolevulinic acid
PubMed external link Trawick JD et al., J Biol Chem, 1989 Apr 25;264(12):7005-8Trawick JD et al., J Biol Chem, 1989 Apr 25;264(12):7005-8 N/A N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Schuurmans JM et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2008 Feb;8(1):26-34Schuurmans JM et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2008 Feb;8(1):26-34 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive CEN.PK113-7D wt versus Tf overexpression 0.67 %YNB, 2% glucose and 0.1 M phtalic acid pH 5 30.C mid exp cells
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Imamura Y et al., PLoS One, 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0130397Imamura Y et al., PLoS One, 2015 Jun 18;10(6):e0130397 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPEG (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, 3% EtOH, 3% Glycerol)
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator