PubMed
Rosenkrantz M et al., Mol Microbiol, 1994 Jul;13(1):119-31Rosenkrantz M et al., Mol Microbiol, 1994 Jul;13(1):119-31
Direct
lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence
N/A
S288c
N/A
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77
Indirect
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
S288c
YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed
Galdieri L et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2016 Jan 19;36(7):1064-77Galdieri L et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2016 Jan 19;36(7):1064-77
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant
Positive
S288c
Cells were grown at 28.C in YEP medium (1% yeast extract, 2% Bacto peptone) containing 5% glucose
PubMed
Zhang T et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Oct 13;292(41):16942-16954Zhang T et al., J Biol Chem, 2017 Oct 13;292(41):16942-16954
Direct
ChIP
N/A
W303
YEP medium
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000
Direct
ChIP-exo
N/A
CEN.PK 113-5D
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
PubMed
Dzanaeva L et al., Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2021 Sep;114(9):1373-1385Dzanaeva L et al., Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek, 2021 Sep;114(9):1373-1385
Indirect
RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant
Positive
CMB.GS011
YNB medium supplemented with 40 g/L xylose, 30.C, 100 rpm, for 36h.