S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Swi4p	YPL256C	PubMed Dirick L et al., Nature, 1992 Jun 11;357(6378):508-13	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Ogas J et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1015-26	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Nasmyth K et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):995-1013	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Wittenberg C et al., Cell, 1990 Jul 27;62(2):225-37	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Koch C et al., Genes Dev, 1996 Jan 15;10(2):129-41	Direct	DNA footprinting	N/A	S288c	cell cycle mutant arrested in G1
		PubMed Cosma MP et al., Cell, 1999 Apr 30;97(3):299-311	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	cell cycle dependent expression
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	alpha-factor treated cells
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	benomyl stress
		PubMed Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Horak CE et al., Genes Dev, 2002 Dec 1;16(23):3017-33	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Bean JM et al., Genetics, 2005 Sep;171(1):49-61	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Expression along cell cycle
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	N/A	Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
		PubMed Ashe M et al., J Biol Chem, 2008 Mar 7;283(10):6040-9	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Venters BJ et al., Genome Res, 2009 Mar;19(3):360-71	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Truman AW et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2009 Dec;29(24):6449-61	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Wang H et al., PLoS Biol, 2009 Sep;7(9):e1000189	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	cells synchronized in G1 (growth in YEP+2% raffinose)
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Takahata S et al., J Biol Chem, 2011 Oct 7;286(40):34809-19	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Harris MR et al., PLoS One, 2013 Apr 4;8(4):e61059	Direct	ChIP	Positive	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Busnelli S et al., Biochim Biophys Acta, 2013 Dec;1833(12):3254-3264	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Grown in synthetic medium containing 2% glucose, synchronized in G1-phase by Î±-factor treatment and released.Â
		PubMed Hendler A et al., PLoS Genet, 2017 May 15;13(5):e1006778	Direct	ChIP	N/A	15Daub	Alpha factor arrested culturesÂ
			Indirect	RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	15Daub	Strains were synchronized with alpha-factor and gene Indirect was measured at two time points (0, 30 minutes) after release.Â
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	YPD medium, 25.C
		PubMed Matos GS et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Biol Lipids, 2021 Sep;1866(9):158983	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Cells were cultivated to exponential phase in YPD medium and G1 synchronized with alpha factor. Cells were then released in minimal medium (SD medium).