Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Group
Environmental
Condition
Log2FC
Pho4p YAR071W PubMed external link Ogawa N et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2000 Dec;11(12):4309-21Ogawa N et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2000 Dec;11(12):4309-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Exponential phase cells cultivated in YPD N/A
PubMed external link Huang D et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2002 Jul;22(14):5076-88Huang D et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2002 Jul;22(14):5076-88 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY263 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Cells grown to log phase in YPD medium N/A
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive N/A Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Cells grown in synthetic medium supplemented with 2% dextrose N/A
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Carbon source quality/availability Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Negative BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. -0.54748251644555
PubMed external link He BZ et al., eLife, 2017 May 9;6():He BZ et al., eLife, 2017 May 9;6(): Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive K699 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) 100 ml of cell culture grown to OD600nm (600 nm) of 1.5. 8.05956372820869
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive K699 Ion/metal/phosphate/sulfur/vitamin availability Grown in phosphate-free SC medium (Phosphate starvation) at 30°C with shaking. All transcriptional profiling experiments were done in the pho80∆ background. Transcription factor gene deletion. 8.05956372820869
PubMed external link Gurvich Y et al., PLoS biology, 2017 Dec;15(12):e2002039Gurvich Y et al., PLoS biology, 2017 Dec;15(12):e2002039 Indirect RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Ion/metal/phosphate/sulfur/vitamin availability BY4741; SC medium; Phosphate(i) starvation condition; 30.C; mid-log phase N/A
Indirect RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 PHO84-constitutive Ion/metal/phosphate/sulfur/vitamin availability BY4741 PHO84c; SC medium; yeast cell recovery into 20mM P(i) from low P(i); 30.C; 2h growth N/A