Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Download     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Group
Environmental
Condition
Log2FC
Msn4p YCL040W PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YNB medium N/A
PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-A Stress Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C N/A
PubMed external link Herrero P et al., The Biochemical journal, 1999 Oct 15;343 Pt 2(Pt 2):319-25Herrero P et al., The Biochemical journal, 1999 Oct 15;343 Pt 2(Pt 2):319-25 Direct EMSA N/A S288c Carbon source quality/availability Yeasts were grown on 1% (w}v) yeast extract and 2% (w}v) peptone supplemented with 3% (v}v) ethanol (YEPE) at 28 °C until the OD600nm reached 1.0 (early log phase) N/A
PubMed external link Tadi D et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1999 Dec;15(16):1733-45Tadi D et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1999 Dec;15(16):1733-45 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Carbon source quality/availability Diauxic shift; Late-exponential phase cells cultivated in YNB growth medium (0·17% yeast nitrogen base, 0·5% ammonium sulphate and 2% glucose) N/A
PubMed external link Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD + 0,5M NaCl N/A
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Stress Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min N/A
Indirect 2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant) Positive YPH98 Stress Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min N/A
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Stress Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) N/A
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) N/A
PubMed external link Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive IMZ066 Carbon source quality/availability Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) N/A
PubMed external link Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress 10 min shift to pH=8 N/A
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6(): Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD 30.C N/A