S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Swi4p	YDL227C	PubMed Ogas J et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1015-26	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Guarente L et al., Cell, 1984 Feb;36(2):503-11	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Partridge JF et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1997 Apr 4;272(14):9071-7	Direct	EMSA	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Avram D et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1999 Apr;15(6):473-80	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	cell cycle dependent expression	N/A
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	alpha-factor treated cells	N/A
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Stress	benomyl stress	N/A
		PubMed Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Badis G et al., Molecular cell, 2008 Dec 26;32(6):878-87	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	BY4741; S288C; R1158	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.2868680853947
		PubMed Takahata S et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011 Oct 7;286(40):34809-19	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Yarrington RM et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2015 Feb;35(4):688-98	Direct	RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YAPD medium; logarithmically grown strains	N/A
		PubMed Qiu H et al., Genome research, 2016 Feb;26(2):211-25	Direct	ChIP	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	logarithmically growing cells	N/A
		PubMed Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778	Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Negative	15Daub	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Yeast growth media (yeast-peptone-dextrose [YPD], yeast-peptone-acetate, and synthetic complete) were of standard composition	-0.529627395164883
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Negative	15Daub	Cell cycle/morphology	Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and after 30 minutes they were collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.	-0.529627395164883
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium, 25.C	N/A