Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Bas1p YDR408C PubMed external link Daignan-Fornier B et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6746-50Daignan-Fornier B et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1992 Aug 1;89(15):6746-50 Direct EMSA N/A S288c In vitro in vitro N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Subramanian M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2005 Jul;57(1):53-69Subramanian M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2005 Jul;57(1):53-69 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c Nitrogen source quality/availability Minimal B medium upon glycine removal N/A
PubMed external link Fendt SM et al., Molecular systems biology, 2010 Nov 30;6():432Fendt SM et al., Molecular systems biology, 2010 Nov 30;6():432 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Chubukov V et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012 Mar 27;109(13):5127-32Chubukov V et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012 Mar 27;109(13):5127-32 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Nitrogen source quality/availability adenine depletion N/A
PubMed external link Yi DG et al., FEBS letters, 2015 Aug 19;589(18):2409-16Yi DG et al., FEBS letters, 2015 Aug 19;589(18):2409-16 Direct ChIP-seq N/A S288c Carbon source quality/availability YPA N/A
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Cells from a stationary culture in YPD medium were inoculated into fresh YPD medium to a final concentration equivalent to an A 600 of 0.25, and grown at 30 °C for 12 h. 0.35727933762042
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive SK1 Cell cycle/morphology Cells were grown in YPA for 13.5–14 hr at 30°, harvested, resuspended in 2% potassium acetate, and sporulated at 30°. Then, 15 OD600 units of cells were collected at 4 hr in meiosis for RNAseq. Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.35727933762042
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium, 25.C N/A