Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Cbf1p YDR502C PubMed external link Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YNB media supplemented with 20 mg/L methionine N/A
PubMed external link Archer CT et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Jan;38(3):789-96Archer CT et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Jan;38(3):789-96 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303 Ion/metal/phosphate/sulfur/vitamin availability B-media lacking any source of sulfur N/A
PubMed external link Lavoie H et al., PLoS biology, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329Lavoie H et al., PLoS biology, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Negative BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. -0.88990077492018
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic acids research, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic acids research, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Carbon source quality/availability Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h N/A
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Carbon source quality/availability Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h N/A
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Nitrogen source quality/availability Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h N/A
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Carbon source quality/availability Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h N/A