Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Yap1p YDR533C PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Dubacq C et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2006 Feb;275(2):114-24Dubacq C et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2006 Feb;275(2):114-24 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 200mM hydroxyurea
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A 0.2 mM As(III), 1 h
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A 1.0 mM As(III), 1 h
PubMed external link Skoneczna A et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2007 May 1;42(9):1409-20Skoneczna A et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2007 May 1;42(9):1409-20 Indirect Western blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Yeast cells were pregrown to 5 × 106 cells/ml in SD medium and then challenged for 1 h with 0.1 or 0.2 mM hydrogen peroxide
PubMed external link Tan K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2934-9Tan K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2008 Feb 26;105(8):2934-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c SC medium + CDDP (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum )
PubMed external link Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A BY4742 YPD + Sodium selenite (1 mM), hydrogen peroxide (0.3 mM) or benomyl (20 microg/ml)
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2
PubMed external link Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Pimentel C et al., Biochim Biophys Acta, 2014 Jun;1840(6):1977-86Pimentel C et al., Biochim Biophys Acta, 2014 Jun;1840(6):1977-86 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c 2 mM CoSO4
PubMed external link Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19Zhang C et al., Yeast, 2016 Jan;33(1):5-19 Indirect RNA-seq - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c SD medium + Nourseothricin
PubMed external link NatkaÅ„ska U et al., Biochim Biophys Acta, 2017;():NatkaÅ„ska U et al., Biochim Biophys Acta, 2017;(): Indirect LacZ - WT vs TF mutant Negative S288c 2 h to 7% ethanol (2H)
Indirect LacZ - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c 0.5 mM methylglyoxal (2H)
Indirect LacZ - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c 0.2 mM tert-butyl-OOH (2H)
Indirect LacZ - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c 1.25 μM CdCl2 (2H)
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 YPD medium, 25.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator