S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YER062C	PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YNB medium	N/A
		PubMed McBride HJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1999 Jul 23;274(30):21029-36	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	0,7M NaCl 45min	N/A
		PubMed Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	YPH98	Stress	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)	N/A
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2	N/A
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD 30.C	N/A