Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Download     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Group
Environmental
Condition
Log2FC
Msn4p YER103W PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YNB medium N/A
PubMed external link Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Kandror O et al., Molecular cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81Kandror O et al., Molecular cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Stress Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) N/A
PubMed external link Coleman CB et al., Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2008 Jun 1;100(2):334-43Coleman CB et al., Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2008 Jun 1;100(2):334-43 Indirect GFP - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c Stress 35% Ficoll N/A
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress) N/A
PubMed external link Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 N/A
PubMed external link Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Complex industrial media Sake mash on day 5 N/A
PubMed external link Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6(): Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY5764 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD 30.C N/A