S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YFL014W	PubMed Martínez-Pastor MT et al., The EMBO journal, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	7% ethanol 20min	N/A
		PubMed Schmitt AP et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Stress	Methylmethane sulfonate stress	N/A
		PubMed Smith A et al., The EMBO journal, 1998 Jul 1;17(13):3556-64	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SC medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed McBride HJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1999 Jul 23;274(30):21029-36	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	0,7M NaCl 60min	N/A
		PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Stress	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C	N/A
		PubMed Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0	N/A
		PubMed Amorós M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Carbon source quality/availability	Carbon source starvation	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Heat shock	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Osmotic stress	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	oxidative stress	N/A
		PubMed Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	YPH98	Stress	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
			Indirect	2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant)	Positive	YPH98	Stress	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
		PubMed Kandror O et al., Molecular cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	Oxygen availability	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (2 generations)	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Melamed D et al., RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2008 Jul;14(7):1337-51	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Osmotic stress; Exponential phase cells cultivated in YPD growth medium supplemented with1 M NaCl	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)	N/A
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2	N/A
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Nitrogen source quality/availability	Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Complex industrial media	Sake mash on day 5	N/A
		PubMed Sadeh A et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SC medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Weiner A et al., PLoS biology, 2012;10(7):e1001369	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Diamide exposure-15min	N/A
		PubMed Gutin J et al., Molecular systems biology, 2015 Oct 7;11(10):829	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Log phase	N/A
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD 30.C	N/A
		PubMed Bai C et al., PloS one, 2020;15(8):e0237540	Indirect	BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)	N/A
			Indirect	BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence	Positive	SP1	Stress	YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)	N/A
			Indirect	BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)	N/A
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)	N/A
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant	Positive	SP1	Stress	YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure)	N/A
		PubMed Dai B et al., Acta biochimica et biophysica Sinica, 2021 Dec 8;53(12):1723-1730	Indirect	flow cytometry - GFP fluorescence	Positive	W303	Cell cycle/morphology	exposed to different QSMs for 45 min (quorum-sensing molecule), Selective Complete medium (SC, -His)	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., NPJ science of food, 2023 Jul 21;7(1):37	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF double mutant	Positive	BY4741	Carbon source quality/availability	YPD 20% glucose medium (fermentation stationary phase)	N/A