Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Group |
Environmental Condition |
Log2FC |
|
Gln3p
|
YFL021W
|
PubMed
Coffman JA et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1997 Jun;179(11):3416-29Coffman JA et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1997 Jun;179(11):3416-29 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
TCY1 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Minimal medium + proline |
N/A |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Georis I et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2009 Jul;29(13):3803-15Georis I et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2009 Jul;29(13):3803-15 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
proline |
N/A |
PubMed
Staschke KA et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911Staschke KA et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Positive |
WY798 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Grown in synthetic medium (SD) (2% dextrose, 0.5% ammonium sulfate) + amino acids w/o histidine (SC medium). Cells treated for 1 h with 10 mM 3-AT. Transcription factor gene deletion. |
0.04264434 |
| Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Positive |
WY798 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
Grown in synthetic medium (SD) (2% dextrose, 0.5% ammonium sulfate) + amino acids w/o histidine (SC medium). Transcription factor gene deletion. |
0.28273263 |
PubMed
Georis I et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011 Dec 30;286(52):44897-912Georis I et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011 Dec 30;286(52):44897-912 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Methionine sulfoximine |
N/A |
PubMed
Georis I et al., RNA biology, 2015;12(8):824-37Georis I et al., RNA biology, 2015;12(8):824-37 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
wt (TB50) vs gln3DELTA (FV005) mutant, cells grown in YNB medium with proline (Pro) or treated with ammonium and methionine sulfoximine (Am. C Msx); GAT1 expression was assayed using 7 pairs of primers along the open reading frame as shown on the insert |
N/A |
PubMed
Ponomarova O et al., Cell systems, 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6Ponomarova O et al., Cell systems, 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6 |
Indirect |
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S90 |
Carbon source quality/availability |
wt and DELTAgln3 cells were grown in YPAD medium |
N/A |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YPD medium, 25.C |
N/A |
PubMed
Hurieva B et al., Nucleic acids research, 2024 Aug 27;52(15):8763-8777Hurieva B et al., Nucleic acids research, 2024 Aug 27;52(15):8763-8777 |
Direct |
ChEC-seq - wt vs TF truncations |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SD medium |
N/A |