S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YGR088W	PubMed Martínez-Pastor MT et al., The EMBO journal, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	S medium	N/A
		PubMed Schmitt AP et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Stress	Methylmethane sulfonate stress	N/A
		PubMed McBride HJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1999 Jul 23;274(30):21029-36	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Heat Shock 30ºC - 37ºC 20min	N/A
		PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Stress	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C	N/A
		PubMed Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD + 0,5M NaCl	N/A
		PubMed Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0	N/A
		PubMed Amorós M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Carbon source quality/availability	Carbon source starvation	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Heat shock	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Osmotic stress	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	oxidative stress	N/A
		PubMed Hasan R et al., Molecular microbiology, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	YPH98	Stress	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
			Indirect	2D electrophoresis (WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant)	Positive	YPH98	Stress	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Yamamoto A et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium 39ºC (heat shock)	N/A
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Oxygen availability	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations)	N/A
		PubMed Bourges I et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Myxothiazol - Cells were cultivated in YPGal for 7 h and 50 min. Acetoin or acetaldehyde were added at concentrations of 10 mM, and the cells were incubated for 10 min. 8 M myxothiazol was then added, and the cells were incubated for another 10 min	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Yamamoto A et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1373-9	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Diamide	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Complex industrial media	Sake mash on day 5	N/A
		PubMed Weiner A et al., PLoS biology, 2012;10(7):e1001369	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Diamide exposure-45min	N/A
		PubMed Nakazawa N et al., The Journal of general and applied microbiology, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	N/A	MCY3605	Stress	H2O2 stress	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids).	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho	Stress	Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids) treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min at 30 .C (oxidative stress)	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	N/A	MCY3605	Stress	synthetic medium containing uracil with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min	N/A
		PubMed Steidle EA et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2020 Feb 14;295(7):2043-2056	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium	N/A
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	BY4741	Stress	YPD medium treated with 2 and 5 mm hydrogen peroxide for 3 h	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., NPJ science of food, 2023 Jul 21;7(1):37	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF double mutant	Positive	BY4741	Carbon source quality/availability	YPD 20% glucose medium (fermentation stationary phase)	N/A