S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YHR008C	PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YNB medium	N/A
		PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Stress	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C	N/A
		PubMed Epstein CB et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):297-308	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)	N/A
		PubMed Kelley R et al., PLoS genetics, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Stress	YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Complex industrial media	Sake mash on day 5	N/A
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():Kuang Z et al., eLife, 2017 Sep 26;6():	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD 30.C	N/A