Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Put3p YHR037W PubMed external link Axelrod JD et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1991 Jan;11(1):564-7Axelrod JD et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1991 Jan;11(1):564-7 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Marczak JE et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1989 Nov;9(11):4696-705Marczak JE et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1989 Nov;9(11):4696-705 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Nitrogen source quality/availability Cells were grown on minimal medium containing glucose (2%) or galactose (2%) as a carbon source, and the nitrogen source was ammonium sulfate (0.2%), glutamate (0.1%), or proline (0.1%) N/A
PubMed external link Siddiqui AH et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1989 Nov;9(11):4706-12Siddiqui AH et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1989 Nov;9(11):4706-12 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Brandriss MC, Genetics, 1987 Nov;117(3):429-35Brandriss MC, Genetics, 1987 Nov;117(3):429-35 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Nitrogen source quality/availability Proline + Ammonium sulfate- The growth medium contained 2% glucose, adenine sulfate (20 mg/liter), and histidine HCI (20 mg/liter). The nitrogen sources were ammonium sulfate (0.2%) and proline (0.1 %) N/A
PubMed external link Huang HL et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2000 Feb;20(3):892-9Huang HL et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2000 Feb;20(3):892-9 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Nitrogen source quality/availability proline presence N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Onda M et al., Gene, 2004 May 12;332():51-9Onda M et al., Gene, 2004 May 12;332():51-9 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPGal + Adenine N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) SC medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 1.4694528351352
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium, 25.C N/A