Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Hot1p YHR087W PubMed external link Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress YPD + 0,7M NaCl N/A
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6 Direct ChIP N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Cook KE et al., G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2012 Sep;2(9):1129-36Cook KE et al., G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2012 Sep;2(9):1129-36 Direct ChIP-seq N/A S288c Stress 0,4M NaCl N/A
PubMed external link Burns LT et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014 Jun 20;289(25):17668-79Burns LT et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2014 Jun 20;289(25):17668-79 Direct ChIP N/A S288c Stress Cells grown in YPD Wt, Dcka2, and exposed to salt stress (0.4 M NaCl) N/A
PubMed external link Bai C et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2015 Jun 15;26(12):2357-74Bai C et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2015 Jun 15;26(12):2357-74 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741 Stress Expression levels after 60min exposure to 0.9 M KCl. Grown in YNB medium, or yeast/peptone/dextrose (YPD) medium. N/A
PubMed external link Gomar-Alba M et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015 Dec;1849(12):1385-97Gomar-Alba M et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2015 Dec;1849(12):1385-97 Direct ChIP N/A S288c Stress exponentially growing cells were left untreated (control) or exposed to salt osmostress (NaCl 0.4 M) for 10 min N/A
PubMed external link Li T et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2016 Feb;1859(2):405-19Li T et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2016 Feb;1859(2):405-19 Direct ChIP N/A S288c Stress 0.6 M KCl treatment for 25 min N/A
PubMed external link Bai C et al., PloS one, 2020;15(8):e0237540Bai C et al., PloS one, 2020;15(8):e0237540 Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF double mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive BY4741 Stress YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive BY4741 Stress YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF quadruple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive SP1 Stress YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect BETA-galactosidase activity WT vs. TF triple mutant + plasmid with promoter sequence Positive BY4741 Stress YNB (-ura) + 0.7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF double mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF quadruple mutant Positive BY4741 Stress YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs. TF triple mutant Positive SP1 Stress YPD + 0,7M NaCl (1 hour after exposure) N/A