Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Rgt1p YHR094C PubMed external link Ozcan S et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1995 Mar;15(3):1564-72Ozcan S et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1995 Mar;15(3):1564-72 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Ozcan S et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1996 Oct;16(10):5536-45Ozcan S et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1996 Oct;16(10):5536-45 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Pak J et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2002 Sep;22(18):6417-29Pak J et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2002 Sep;22(18):6417-29 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Mosley AL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2003 Mar 21;278(12):10322-7Mosley AL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2003 Mar 21;278(12):10322-7 Direct ChIP N/A S288c Carbon source quality/availability Glucose starvation N/A
PubMed external link Kim JH et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2003 Aug;23(15):5208-16Kim JH et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2003 Aug;23(15):5208-16 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Tomás-Cobos L et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2004 May 21;279(21):22010-9Tomás-Cobos L et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2004 May 21;279(21):22010-9 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Kim JH et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2006 Jan;5(1):167-73Kim JH et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2006 Jan;5(1):167-73 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Kim JH, Biochimie, 2009 Feb;91(2):300-3Kim JH, Biochimie, 2009 Feb;91(2):300-3 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) cells were grown to mid-log phase (OD600=1.0~1.2) in synthetic medium containing 2% galactose N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 0.92723383559781
PubMed external link Jouandot D 2nd et al., Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2011 Nov;112(11):3268-75Jouandot D 2nd et al., Journal of cellular biochemistry, 2011 Nov;112(11):3268-75 Direct ChIP N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A