Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Group |
Environmental Condition |
Log2FC |
|
Cbf1p
|
YJL151C
|
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
N/A |
PubMed
Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YNB media supplemented with 20 mg/L methionine |
N/A |
PubMed
Lavoie H et al., PLoS biology, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329Lavoie H et al., PLoS biology, 2010 Mar 9;8(3):e1000329 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YPD |
N/A |
PubMed
Shetty A et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2010 Dec;9(12):1845-55Shetty A et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2010 Dec;9(12):1845-55 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
Without Inositol and Cholin |
N/A |
PubMed
Shetty A et al., Journal of molecular biology, 2013 Feb 8;425(3):457-65Shetty A et al., Journal of molecular biology, 2013 Feb 8;425(3):457-65 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Lipid supplementation |
complete synthetic medium containing 10 μM or 75 μM inositol |
N/A |
| Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
complete synthetic medium lacking inositol |
N/A |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic acids research, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic acids research, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Carbon source quality/availability |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
N/A |
| Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Carbon source quality/availability |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
N/A |
| Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
N/A |
| Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Carbon source quality/availability |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
N/A |