S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Mac1p	YLR214W	PubMed Jungmann J et al., The EMBO journal, 1993 Dec 15;12(13):5051-6	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Labbé S et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1997 Jun 20;272(25):15951-8	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Yamaguchi-Iwai Y et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1997 Jul 11;272(28):17711-8	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	presence of CuSO4	N/A
		PubMed Martins LJ et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1998 Sep 11;273(37):23716-21	Direct	DNA footprinting	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Minimal medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Dormer UH et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2000 Oct 20;275(42):32611-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	S288c	Ion/metal/phosphate/sulfur/vitamin availability	low copper complete medium	N/A
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Keller G et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2005 Nov;4(11):1863-71	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Stress	SC medium 0,3mM CuSO4	N/A
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Cahyani I et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2015 Feb;35(3):544-54	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Stress	100 microM SNAP (S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine)	N/A
		PubMed James Theoga Raj C et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019 Apr 5;294(14):5562-5575	Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	N/A	BY4742	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Grown in liquid synthetic minimal medium (YNB) with arginine at 30°C overnight, diluted and cultivated to mid-log phase before isolation of total RNA. 10 mM 3-amino-triazole (3AT) was added to cultures grown to mid-log phase for further 8 h. Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.247736093778212
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	N/A	BY4742	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Grown in SD medium. Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.247736093778212
		PubMed Yang L et al., Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019;12():30	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	1308	Stress	NO-treated biofilm cells	N/A
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	1308	Stress	NO-treated biofilm cells	N/A
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium, 25.C	N/A