S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YLR258W	PubMed Parrou JL et al., Microbiology (Reading, England), 1997 Jun;143 ( Pt 6)():1891-1900	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	37ºC	N/A
		PubMed Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD + 0,5M NaCl	N/A
		PubMed Enjalbert B et al., Molecular genetics and genomics : MGG, 2004 Jul;271(6):697-708	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Carbon source quality/availability	diauxic shift	N/A
		PubMed Lai LC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Oxygen availability	SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,19 generations)	N/A
		PubMed Bandhakavi S et al., PloS one, 2008 Feb 13;3(2):e1598	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	n/a	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	wt versus TF mutant YPD media 25.C mid exp cells	N/A
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nature genetics, 2008 Nov;40(11):1300-6	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Complex industrial media	Sake mash on day 5	N/A
		PubMed Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	10 min shift to pH=8	N/A
		PubMed Walden EA et al., PLoS genetics, 2020 Nov;16(11):e1009220	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant and western blot	Positive	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium	N/A