S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Msn4p	YMR170C	PubMed Navarro-Aviño JP et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1999 Jul;15(10A):829-42	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	YPD medium, exponential phase; 2h incubation with 1M KCl	N/A
		PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-A	Stress	Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C	N/A
		PubMed Garcia SC et al., FEMS microbiology letters, 2000 Mar 15;184(2):219-24	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	YPD + 0,5M NaCl	N/A
		PubMed Aranda A et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 2003 Jun;20(8):747-59	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	Acetaldehyde stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated for 1 h in YPD supplemented with 1 g/L acetaldehyde	N/A
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Stress	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)	N/A
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Applied and environmental microbiology, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Complex industrial media	Sake mash on day 5	N/A
		PubMed Casado C et al., The Biochemical journal, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Stress	10 min shift to pH=8	N/A