Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Hsf1p YMR186W PubMed external link Zarzov P et al., Journal of cell science, 1997 Aug;110 ( Pt 16)():1879-91Zarzov P et al., Journal of cell science, 1997 Aug;110 ( Pt 16)():1879-91 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Stress 24oC/37oC - heat shock N/A
PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Molecular microbiology, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive MYY290 Stress Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Carbon source quality/availability Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 1.3352588208541
PubMed external link Solís EJ et al., Molecular cell, 2016 Jul 7;63(1):60-71Solís EJ et al., Molecular cell, 2016 Jul 7;63(1):60-71 Indirect Net-seq Positive S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) basal conditions N/A
PubMed external link de Jonge WJ et al., The EMBO journal, 2017 Feb 1;36(3):274-290de Jonge WJ et al., The EMBO journal, 2017 Feb 1;36(3):274-290 Direct ChIP N/A S288C Unstressed log-phase growth (control) SC medium N/A
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Negative S288C Unstressed log-phase growth (control) SC medium N/A
PubMed external link Pincus D et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2018 Dec 15;29(26):3168-3182Pincus D et al., Molecular biology of the cell, 2018 Dec 15;29(26):3168-3182 Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY4741 Stress YPDA (with 0.002% adenine), non-heat shock, 5´heat shock and 120´heat shock N/A
Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY4741 Stress YPDA (with 0.002% adenine) Rapamycin (1 microM), non-heat shock N/A
Direct ChIP-seq N/A BY4741 Stress YPDA (with 0.002% adenine), 5' heat shock N/A
Indirect NAC-seq (nascent mRNA-sequencing) Positive BY4741 Stress YPDA (with 0.002% adenine) Rapamycin (1 microM), non-heat shock N/A
Indirect NAC-seq (nascent mRNA-sequencing) Positive BY4741 Stress YPDA (with 0.002% adenine), 5' heat shock N/A
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium, 25.C N/A