S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Bas1p	YMR300C	PubMed Denis V et al., Molecular microbiology, 1998 Nov;30(3):557-66	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	L3079	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SD media, mid-exponential	N/A
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SC medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Subramanian M et al., Molecular microbiology, 2005 Jul;57(1):53-69	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	Nitrogen source quality/availability	Minimal B medium upon glycine removal	N/A
		PubMed Tournu H et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2005 Oct;4(10):1687-96	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Exponential-phase cells cultivated in SC growth medium without adenine	N/A
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Koehler RN et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1474-85	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	medium lacking adenine (derepressing conditions)	N/A
		PubMed Sellam A et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2010 Apr;9(4):634-44	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	BY4741; S288C; R1158	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.94972968566445
		PubMed Fendt SM et al., Molecular systems biology, 2010 Nov 30;6():432	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Chubukov V et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012 Mar 27;109(13):5127-32	Indirect	GFP - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Nitrogen source quality/availability	adenine depletion	N/A
		PubMed Yi DG et al., FEBS letters, 2015 Aug 19;589(18):2409-16	Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	SK1	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Cells from a stationary culture in YPD medium were inoculated into fresh YPD medium to a final concentration equivalent to an A 600 of 0.25, and grown at 30 °C for 12 h.	1.12483538293647
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	SK1	Cell cycle/morphology	Cells were grown in YPA for 13.5–14 hr at 30°, harvested, resuspended in 2% potassium acetate, and sporulated at 30°. Then, 15 OD600 units of cells were collected at 4 hr in meiosis for RNAseq. Transcription factor gene deletion.	1.12483538293647
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium, 25.C	N/A