Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
|
Cat8p
|
YMR303C
|
PubMed
Rahner A et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1996 Jun 15;24(12):2331-7Rahner A et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1996 Jun 15;24(12):2331-7 |
Indirect |
LacZ - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
JS91.15-23 |
SC medium 0.2% glucose |
PubMed
Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diauxic shift; Cells cultivated in YNB growth medium and harvested after glucose exhaustion |
PubMed
Walther K et al., Microbiology, 2001;():Walther K et al., Microbiology, 2001;(): |
Indirect |
LacZ - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Derepression conditions - yeast transformants were grown in selective medium under derepressing conditions (0ยท2% glucose+2% ethanol) |
PubMed
Young ET et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Jul 11;278(28):26146-58Young ET et al., J Biol Chem, 2003 Jul 11;278(28):26146-58 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Yeast cells were grown in rich (YP) medium, log-phase |
PubMed
Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46 |
Indirect |
LacZ - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Growth in glucose derepression conditions (0.05% glucose) |
PubMed
Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
0,05% glucose 6h |
PubMed
Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Glucose starvation; Exponential cells cultivated in SM with 0.05% glucose |
PubMed
Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YP + 0,05% glucose |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2013;77(11):2255-62Watanabe D et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2013;77(11):2255-62 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Grown in YPD medium for 7 days |
PubMed
Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YP medium + 0.05% glucose |
PubMed
Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
Grown in glucose and shifted to 3% ethanol for two hours |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
| Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |