Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Group		 Environmental
Condition		 Log2FC
Swi4p YNL289W PubMed external link Ogas J et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1015-26Ogas J et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1015-26 N/A N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium; mid-log phase N/A
PubMed external link Bean JM et al., Genetics, 2005 Sep;171(1):49-61Bean JM et al., Genetics, 2005 Sep;171(1):49-61 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Cell cycle/morphology Expression along cell cycle N/A
PubMed external link Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Carbon source quality/availability Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h N/A
PubMed external link Badis G et al., Molecular cell, 2008 Dec 26;32(6):878-87Badis G et al., Molecular cell, 2008 Dec 26;32(6):878-87 Direct ChIP N/A S288c N/A N/A N/A
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive BY4741; S288C; R1158 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. 1.0317850373953
PubMed external link Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778 Direct ChIP N/A 15Daub Cell cycle/morphology Alpha factor arrested cultures  N/A
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive 15Daub Unstressed log-phase growth (control) Yeast growth media (yeast-peptone-dextrose [YPD], yeast-peptone-acetate, and synthetic complete) were of standard composition 3.03409081142292
Indirect RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion Positive 15Daub Cell cycle/morphology Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and after 30 minutes they were collected. Transcription factor gene deletion. 3.03409081142292
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 Unstressed log-phase growth (control) YPD medium, 25.C N/A