Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Yap1p YPL091W PubMed external link Grant CM et al., Mol Microbiol, 1996 Jul;21(1):171-9Grant CM et al., Mol Microbiol, 1996 Jul;21(1):171-9 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Cells were grown to OD of 1 and RNA extracted
PubMed external link Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6Lee J et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Jun 4;274(23):16040-6 Indirect Proteomics - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c 15 minutes exposure to 0.2 mM H2O2 (SC growth medium)
PubMed external link Inoue Y et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Sep 17;274(38):27002-9Inoue Y et al., J Biol Chem, 1999 Sep 17;274(38):27002-9 N/A N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Dumond H et al., Mol Microbiol, 2000 May;36(4):830-45Dumond H et al., Mol Microbiol, 2000 May;36(4):830-45 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303a Exponential cells grown in galactose minimal medium followed by oxidative stress (0.4mM H2O2)
PubMed external link Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60Wysocki R et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2004 May;15(5):2049-60 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Arsenite stress; Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YNB growth medium supplemented with 1 mM sodium arsenite
PubMed external link Haugen AC et al., Genome Biol, 2004;5(12):R95Haugen AC et al., Genome Biol, 2004;5(12):R95 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 Synthetic complete medium after 2h exposure to 100 microM AsIII (30.C).
PubMed external link Lucau-Danila A et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(5):1860-8Lucau-Danila A et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(5):1860-8 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 20 mg/L benomyl
PubMed external link Dubacq C et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2006 Feb;275(2):114-24Dubacq C et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2006 Feb;275(2):114-24 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 200mM hydroxyurea
PubMed external link Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43Thorsen M et al., Physiol Genomics, 2007 Jun 19;30(1):35-43 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A 1.0 mM As(III), 1 h
PubMed external link Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33Salin H et al., BMC Genomics, 2008 Jul 15;0(0):33 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A BY4742 YPD + Sodium selenite (1 mM), hydrogen peroxide (0.3 mM) or benomyl (20 microg/ml)
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 40 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 60 min
Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4742 YPD+1mM selenite 80 min
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link da Silva SM et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018 Oct;1862(10):2152-2161da Silva SM et al., Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj, 2018 Oct;1862(10):2152-2161 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD + 2 mM arsenic
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator