PubMed
Messenguy F et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1991 May;11(5):2852-63Messenguy F et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1991 May;11(5):2852-63
Direct
EMSA
N/A
S288c
In vitro
in vitro
N/A
PubMed
Kovari LZ et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1993 Aug;9(8):835-45Kovari LZ et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1993 Aug;9(8):835-45
Direct
lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence
N/A
S288c
N/A
N/A
N/A
PubMed
Jorgensen MU et al., Current genetics, 1997 Mar;31(3):241-7Jorgensen MU et al., Current genetics, 1997 Mar;31(3):241-7
Indirect
Enzyme activity - wt vs mutant promoter sequence
Positive
S288c
Nitrogen source quality/availability
Nitrogen starvation
N/A
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77
Indirect
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion
Positive
BY4741; S288C; R1158
Unstressed log-phase growth (control)
Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.
1.0704427046347
PubMed
Baker CR et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):104-8Baker CR et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2013 Oct 4;342(6154):104-8