Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Group |
Environmental Condition |
Log2FC |
|
Gln3p
|
YPL111W
|
PubMed
Cooper TG et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1990 Feb;172(2):1014-8Cooper TG et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1990 Feb;172(2):1014-8 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
AM100 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Minimal glucose proline medium |
N/A |
PubMed
Cunningham TS et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1996 Jun;178(12):3470-9Cunningham TS et al., Journal of bacteriology, 1996 Jun;178(12):3470-9 |
Direct |
EMSA |
N/A |
S288c |
In vitro |
in vitro |
N/A |
PubMed
Smart WC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1996 Oct;16(10):5876-87Smart WC et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 1996 Oct;16(10):5876-87 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
TCY1 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Wickerham's minimal medium + proline |
N/A |
PubMed
Jorgensen MU et al., Current genetics, 1997 Mar;31(3):241-7Jorgensen MU et al., Current genetics, 1997 Mar;31(3):241-7 |
Indirect |
Enzyme activity - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
growth on glutamate (release of nitrogen catabolite repression) |
N/A |
PubMed
Shamji AF et al., Current biology : CB, 2000 Dec 14-28;10(24):1574-81Shamji AF et al., Current biology : CB, 2000 Dec 14-28;10(24):1574-81 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
30 min 50 nM treatment with rapamycin in YPD |
N/A |
PubMed
Staschke KA et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911Staschke KA et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Positive |
WY798 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Grown in synthetic medium (SD) (2% dextrose, 0.5% ammonium sulfate) + amino acids w/o histidine (SC medium). Cells treated for 1 h with 10 mM 3-AT. Transcription factor gene deletion. |
0.12432814 |
| Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Positive |
WY798 |
Nitrogen source quality/availability |
Grown in synthetic medium (SD) (2% dextrose, 0.5% ammonium sulfate) + amino acids w/o histidine (SC medium). Cells treated for 1 h with 200 nM rapamycin. Transcription factor gene deletion. |
0.422233 |
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Negative |
BY4741; S288C; R1158 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion. |
-0.47876987115241 |
PubMed
Ponomarova O et al., Cell systems, 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6Ponomarova O et al., Cell systems, 2017 Oct 25;5(4):345-357.e6 |
Indirect |
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Negative |
S90 |
Cell cycle/morphology |
Second acidic phase (day 21): Giant colonies grown on GM solid agar (1% yeast extract, 3% glycerol, 2% agar, 30 mM CaCl2) at room temperature; colonies harvested at day 21, corresponding to the second acidic phase. |
-1.350603150242 |
| Indirect |
RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion |
Negative |
S90 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
Grown in CDM35 at 30 ÂșC and harvested at OD600 of 1. Transcription factor gene deletion. |
-1.350603150242 |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
YPD medium, 25.C |
N/A |
PubMed
Hurieva B et al., Nucleic acids research, 2024 Aug 27;52(15):8763-8777Hurieva B et al., Nucleic acids research, 2024 Aug 27;52(15):8763-8777 |
Direct |
ChEC-seq - wt vs TF truncations |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Unstressed log-phase growth (control) |
SD medium |
N/A |