S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Swi4p	YPL256C	PubMed Dirick L et al., Nature, 1992 Jun 11;357(6378):508-13	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Ogas J et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):1015-26	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Nasmyth K et al., Cell, 1991 Sep 6;66(5):995-1013	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Wittenberg C et al., Cell, 1990 Jul 27;62(2):225-37	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Koch C et al., Genes & development, 1996 Jan 15;10(2):129-41	Direct	DNA footprinting	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	cell cycle mutant arrested in G1	N/A
		PubMed Avram D et al., Yeast (Chichester, England), 1999 Apr;15(6):473-80	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	cell cycle dependent expression	N/A
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	alpha-factor treated cells	N/A
		PubMed Iyer VR et al., Nature, 2001 Jan 25;409(6819):533-8	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Stress	benomyl stress	N/A
		PubMed Simon I et al., Cell, 2001 Sep 21;106(6):697-708	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Horak CE et al., Genes & development, 2002 Dec 1;16(23):3017-33	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Bean JM et al., Genetics, 2005 Sep;171(1):49-61	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	Expression along cell cycle	N/A
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Chua G et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	N/A	Carbon source quality/availability	Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h	N/A
		PubMed Ashe M et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2008 Mar 7;283(10):6040-9	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Badis G et al., Molecular cell, 2008 Dec 26;32(6):878-87	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Truman AW et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2009 Dec;29(24):6449-61	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Wang H et al., PLoS biology, 2009 Sep;7(9):e1000189	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	cells synchronized in G1 (growth in YEP+2% raffinose)	N/A
		PubMed Reimand J et al., Nucleic acids research, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77	Indirect	Microarray analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	BY4741; S288C; R1158	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Standard YPD conditions Dataset ewxtracted from The Longhorn Array Database (LAD). Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.62752300047059
		PubMed Takahata S et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2011 Oct 7;286(40):34809-19	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Harris MR et al., PloS one, 2013;8(4):e61059	Direct	ChIP	Positive	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Busnelli S et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2013 Dec;1833(12):3254-3264	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Cell cycle/morphology	Grown in synthetic medium containing 2% glucose, synchronized in G1-phase by Î±-factor treatment and released.Â	N/A
		PubMed Hendler A et al., PLoS genetics, 2017 May;13(5):e1006778	Direct	ChIP	N/A	15Daub	Cell cycle/morphology	Alpha factor arrested culturesÂ	N/A
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	15Daub	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Yeast strains were grown in rich medium at 30°C to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5.	0.533053974373296
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	15Daub	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Yeast growth media (yeast-peptone-dextrose [YPD], yeast-peptone-acetate, and synthetic complete) were of standard composition	2.14261609355849
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	15Daub	Cell cycle/morphology	Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and immediately collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.	0.533053974373296
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	Positive	15Daub	Cell cycle/morphology	Cells were grown in 7 ml of SC over-night at 30°C. Cells were synchronized by alpha factor arrest and release and after 30 minutes they were collected. Transcription factor gene deletion.	2.14261609355849
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium, 25.C	N/A
		PubMed Matos GS et al., Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular and cell biology of lipids, 2021 Sep;1866(9):158983	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	BY4741	Cell cycle/morphology	Cells were cultivated to exponential phase in YPD medium and G1 synchronized with alpha factor. Cells were then released in minimal medium (SD medium).	N/A
		PubMed Ros-Carrero C et al., Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2024 May-Jun;23(9-12):817-833	Direct	ChIP	N/A	W303-1a	Cell cycle/morphology	SC medium (cell cycle)	N/A