S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Group	Environmental Condition	Log2FC
Mac1p	YPR124W	PubMed Labbé S et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1997 Jun 20;272(25):15951-8	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Yamaguchi-Iwai Y et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 1997 Jul 11;272(28):17711-8	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Dormer UH et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2000 Oct 20;275(42):32611-6	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium; mid-log phase	N/A
		PubMed Keller G et al., Eukaryotic cell, 2005 Nov;4(11):1863-71	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Workman CT et al., Science (New York, N.Y.), 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	N/A	N/A	N/A
		PubMed Heo DH et al., The Biochemical journal, 2010 Oct 15;431(2):257-65	Indirect	lacZ - wt vs TF mutant	Negative	S288c	Stress	Copper treatment	N/A
		PubMed Dong K et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2013 Oct;33(20):4041-50	Direct	DNA footprinting	Positive	S288c	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SD medium	N/A
		PubMed Cahyani I et al., Molecular and cellular biology, 2015 Feb;35(3):544-54	Direct	ChIP	N/A	S288c	Stress	100 microM SNAP (S-nitroso-N-acetylpenicillamine)	N/A
		PubMed Voutsina A et al., Current genetics, 2019 Jun;65(3):799-816	Direct	ChIP	N/A	FT5	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	FT5; SC medium with copper (CTR1 repression); 30.C; early-log phase	N/A
			Direct	ChIP	N/A	FT5	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	FT5; SC medium (non-inducing); 30.C; early-log phase	N/A
			Direct	ChIP	N/A	FT5	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	FT5; SC medium (shifted-inducing, copper); 30.C; early-log phase	N/A
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression	Negative	FT5	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	FT5; SC medium 30.C; early-log phase	N/A
		PubMed James Theoga Raj C et al., The Journal of biological chemistry, 2019 Apr 5;294(14):5562-5575	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	BY4742	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	SD medium	N/A
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	N/A	BY4742	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Grown in liquid synthetic minimal medium (YNB) with arginine at 30°C overnight, diluted and cultivated to mid-log phase before isolation of total RNA. 10 mM 3-amino-triazole (3AT) was added to cultures grown to mid-log phase for further 8 h. Transcription factor gene deletion.	1.14693269175223
			Indirect	RNA-seq analysis - WT vs TF Deletion	N/A	BY4742	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	Grown in SD medium. Transcription factor gene deletion.	1.14693269175223
		PubMed Yang L et al., Biotechnology for biofuels, 2019;12():30	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF overexpression	Positive	1308	Stress	NO-treated biofilm cells	N/A
			Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs. TF mutant	Positive	1308	Stress	NO-treated biofilm cells	N/A
		PubMed Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314	Direct	ChIP-exo	N/A	BY4741	Unstressed log-phase growth (control)	YPD medium, 25.C	N/A