Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YDR074W
|
PubMed
Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
PubMed
Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD + 0,5M NaCl |
PubMed
Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Cold stress; Cells cultivated for 24h at 0ÂșC in YP growth medium with galactose as carbon source |
PubMed
Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations) |
PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1B |
Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate) |
PubMed
Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7Berry DB et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2008 Nov;19(11):4580-7 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD+0.7 M NaCl 45min |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD e 30-37.C heat shock 15min |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
PubMed
Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Sake mash on day 5 |
PubMed
Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
10 min shift to pH=8 |
PubMed
Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38Sadeh A et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2011 Sep;22(17):3127-38 |
Indirect |
GFP - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY5764 |
YPD 30.C |