Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YDR453C
|
PubMed
Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD + 0,5M NaCl |
PubMed
Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17Hong SK et al., J Biol Chem, 2002 Apr 5;277(14):12109-17 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
double Δmsn2,3 mutant; post-diauxic shift |
PubMed
Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YPH98 |
Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min |
PubMed
Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97Wong CM et al., Free Radic Biol Med, 2003 Mar 1;34(5):585-97 |
Indirect |
LacZ - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Oxidative stress, Exponential-phase cells cultivated in SC medium supplemented with 0.5 mM H2O2 |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35Horan S et al., Yeast, 2006 May;23(7):519-35 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1B |
Cells harvested 60 min after treatment with 3 mM NO donor (Z)-1-[2-(2-aminoethyl)-N-(2-ammonioethyl) aminodiazen-1-ium-1,2-diolate (DETA NONOate) |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress) |
PubMed
Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488Kelley R et al., PLoS Genet, 2009 May;5(5):e1000488 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD 30.C 0.1 mM H2O2 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YPD 30.C from 0.1 mM H2O2 to 0.4 mM H2O2 |
PubMed
Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
IMZ066 |
Carbon-limiting (25 g/L glucose, 5 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O) |
PubMed
Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diamide exposure-90min |