The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Msn4p
|
YER150W
|
PubMed
Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48Puig S et al., Yeast, 2000 Jan 30;16(2):139-48 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Exponential-phase cells cultivated in YPD supplemented with 0.4% NaCl |
PubMed
Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD + 0,5M NaCl |
PubMed
Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0 |
PubMed
Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min) |
PubMed
Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress) |
PubMed
Cardona F et al., Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2012 Sep;17(3):393-407Cardona F et al., Cell Mol Biol Lett, 2012 Sep;17(3):393-407 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
pos diauxic phase |
PubMed
Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY5764 |
YPD 30.C |
|