Yeastract
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Msn4p YGR088W PubMed external link Martínez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35Martínez-Pastor MT et al., EMBO J, 1996 May 1;15(9):2227-35 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF overexpression Positive S288c S medium
PubMed external link Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82Schmitt AP et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1996 Jun 11;93(12):5777-82 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF overexpression Positive S288c Methylmethane sulfonate stress
PubMed external link Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85Rep M et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1999 Aug;19(8):5474-85 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Heat Shock 30ºC - 37ºC 20min
PubMed external link Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83Boy-Marcotte E et al., Mol Microbiol, 1999 Jul;33(2):274-83 Indirect Proteomics - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303-A Heat-shock: Exponential-phase cells shifted from 25C to 38C
PubMed external link Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300Rep M et al., J Biol Chem, 2000 Mar 24;275(12):8290-300 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD + 0,5M NaCl
PubMed external link Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0
PubMed external link Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32Amorós M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Carbon source starvation
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Heat shock
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Osmotic stress
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c oxidative stress
PubMed external link Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41 Indirect Proteomics - WT vs TF mutant Positive YPH98 Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
Indirect 2D electrophoresis - WT vs msn2DELTAmsn4DELTAyap1DELTA triple mutant Positive YPH98 Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c N/A
PubMed external link Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9Yamamoto A et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Mar 25;280(12):11911-9 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium 39ºC (heat shock)
PubMed external link Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91Lai LC et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 May;25(10):4075-91 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c SSGal-TEA medium + anaerobiosis (0,08 generations)
PubMed external link Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9Bourges I et al., J Biol Chem, 2005 Aug 19;280(33):29743-9 Indirect RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Myxothiazol - Cells were cultivated in YPGal for 7 h and 50 min. Acetoin or acetaldehyde were added at concentrations of 10 mM, and the cells were incubated for 10 min. 8 M myxothiazol was then added, and the cells were incubated for another 10 min
PubMed external link Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive W303-1A Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
PubMed external link Yamamoto A et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1373-9Yamamoto A et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2007 Aug;6(8):1373-9 Indirect RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diamide
PubMed external link Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium containing 0,8M glucose (glucose "osmotic" stress)
PubMed external link Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41 Indirect RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Sake mash on day 5
PubMed external link Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369Weiner A et al., PLoS Biol, 2012;10(7):e1001369 Indirect Microarray analysis - WT vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diamide exposure-45min
PubMed external link Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157Nakazawa N et al., J Gen Appl Microbiol, 2018 Sep 27;64(4):149-157 Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant N/A MCY3605 H2O2 stress
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Positive Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids).
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant Negative Shirakami kodama yeast (S. cerevisiae) IB1306 MATalpha ho Cells grown in supplemented synthetic medium (SD, 0.67% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 2% glucose, and a supplement with amino acids) treated with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min at 30 .C (oxidative stress)
Indirect Northern blot - WT vs TF mutant N/A MCY3605 synthetic medium containing uracil with 0.3 mM H2O2 for 30 min
PubMed external link Steidle EA et al., J Biol Chem, 2020 Feb 14;295(7):2043-2056Steidle EA et al., J Biol Chem, 2020 Feb 14;295(7):2043-2056 Indirect RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4741 YPD medium
Indirect RT-PCR - WT vs TF mutant Negative BY4741 YPD medium treated with 2 and 5 mm hydrogen peroxide for 3 h
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator