S.cerevisiae - Yeastract

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.

Transcription Factor	Target ORF/Genes	References	Evidence Code	Evidence Experiment	Association Type	Strain	Environmental Condition
Msn4p	YLL026W	PubMed Boy-Marcotte E et al., J Bacteriol, 1998 Mar;180(5):1044-52	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303	YNB medium
		PubMed Causton HC et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2001 Feb;12(2):323-37	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 0,05M succinic acid, pH 4,0
		PubMed AmorÃ³s M et al., Mol Microbiol, 2001 Mar;39(6):1523-32	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Heat shock
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Osmotic stress
			Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	oxidative stress
		PubMed Hasan R et al., Mol Microbiol, 2002 Jul;45(1):233-41	Indirect	Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	YPH98	Oxidative stess; cells grown in YNB medium to exponential phase exposed to 0.5 mM H2O2 for 30 min
		PubMed Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed SeppÃ¤ L et al., Mol Microbiol, 2004 Apr;52(1):217-25	N/A		N/A	S288c	N/A
		PubMed Kandror O et al., Mol Cell, 2004 Mar 26;13(6):771-81	Indirect	Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Cold stress; Cells cultivated for 24h at 0ºC in YP growth medium with galactose as carbon source
		PubMed Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104	Direct	Chip-on-chip	N/A	S288c	YPD medium; mid-log phase
		PubMed Eastmond DL et al., J Biol Chem, 2006 Oct 27;281(43):32909-21	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	W303-1A	Cells grown in YPAD at 30.C to mid-log phase (A600 of 0.5) submitted to heat-shock (37.C, 15 min)
		PubMed Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():Capaldi AP et al., Nat Genet, 2008;():	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	YPD medium + 0,4M KCl (salt stress)
		PubMed Hazelwood LA et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2009 Nov;75(21):6876-85	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	IMZ066	Nitrogen-limiting (45 g/L glucose, 1 g/L (NH4)2SO4, 5.3 g/L K2SO4, 3 KH2PO4, 0.5 g/L MgSO4.7H2O, 0.0045 g/L ZnSO4.7H2O)
		PubMed Watanabe D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2011 Feb;77(3):934-41	Indirect	RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	Sake mash on day 5
		PubMed Casado C et al., Biochem J, 2011 Sep 15;438(3):523-33	Indirect	Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant	Positive	S288c	10 min shift to pH=8
		PubMed Kuang Z et al., Elife, 2017 Sep 26;6(0):e29938	Direct	ChIP-seq	N/A	BY5764	YPD 30.C