Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Adr1p YMR303C PubMed external link Ciriacy M, Mol Gen Genet, 1976 Jun 15;145(3):327-33Ciriacy M, Mol Gen Genet, 1976 Jun 15;145(3):327-33 Indirect Enzyme activity - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c growth on a 10% glucose-YEP-medium for 36h
PubMed external link Walther K et al., Microbiology, 2001;():Walther K et al., Microbiology, 2001;(): Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Derepression conditions - yeast transformants were grown in selective medium under derepressing conditions (0ยท2% glucose+2% ethanol)
PubMed external link Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Growth in glucose derepression conditions (0.05% glucose)
PubMed external link Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression Positive N/A Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h
PubMed external link Smith JJ et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;():Smith JJ et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;(): Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4742 or BY4739 5-h induction in oleate
PubMed external link Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15 Direct RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence Positive S288c 0,05% glucose 4h
PubMed external link Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Glucose starvation; Exponential cells cultivated in SM with 0.05% glucose
PubMed external link Ratnakumar S et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 Apr 2;285(14):10703-14Ratnakumar S et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 Apr 2;285(14):10703-14 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Glucose repression; Exponential-phase cells cultivated in synthetic growth medium containing 5% glucose as carbon source
PubMed external link Young ET et al., J Biol Chem, 2012 Aug 17;287(34):29021-34Young ET et al., J Biol Chem, 2012 Aug 17;287(34):29021-34 Direct ChIP N/A S288c YP + 0,05% glucose
PubMed external link Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24 Direct ChIP N/A S288c YP medium + 0.005% glucose
PubMed external link Watanabe D et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2013;77(11):2255-62Watanabe D et al., Biosci Biotechnol Biochem, 2013;77(11):2255-62 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Grown in YPD medium for 7 days
PubMed external link Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YP medium + 0.05% glucose
PubMed external link Simpson-Lavy K et al., Sci Rep, 2019 Apr 24;9(1):6491Simpson-Lavy K et al., Sci Rep, 2019 Apr 24;9(1):6491 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c 2% ethanol (3H)
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator