Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Cat8p YAL054C PubMed external link Kratzer S et al., Mol Microbiol, 1997 Nov;26(4):631-41Kratzer S et al., Mol Microbiol, 1997 Nov;26(4):631-41 Direct lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence Positive S288c SCD 0,2% glucose
PubMed external link Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85 Indirect Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Diauxic shift; Cells cultivated in YNB growth medium 25 minutes after glucose exhaustion
PubMed external link Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46 Indirect lacZ - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Growth in glucose derepression conditions (0.05% glucose)
PubMed external link Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15 Direct ChIP N/A S288c 0,05% glucose 6h
PubMed external link Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Glucose starvation; Exponential cells cultivated in SM with 0.05% glucose
PubMed external link Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YP + 0,05% glucose
PubMed external link Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YP medium + 0.05% glucose
PubMed external link Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c Grown in glucose and shifted to 3% ethanol for two hours
PubMed external link Wierman MB et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2017 Jun 15;37(13):e00562-16Wierman MB et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2017 Jun 15;37(13):e00562-16 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 SC medium -18h
Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 SC medium with 0.5% glucose -18h
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator