Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Cat8p
|
YLR377C
|
PubMed
Rahner A et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1996 Jun 15;24(12):2331-7Rahner A et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 1996 Jun 15;24(12):2331-7 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
JS91.15-23 |
SC medium 0.2% glucose |
PubMed
Vincent O et al., EMBO J, 1998 Dec 1;17(23):7002-8Vincent O et al., EMBO J, 1998 Dec 1;17(23):7002-8 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
2% glycerol 2% ethanol 5h30min |
PubMed
Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85Haurie V et al., J Biol Chem, 2001 Jan 5;276(1):76-85 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Diauxic shift; Cells cultivated in YNB growth medium 25 minutes after glucose exhaustion |
PubMed
Zaragoza O et al., Biochem J, 2001;():Zaragoza O et al., Biochem J, 2001;(): |
Direct |
EMSA |
N/A |
W303-1A |
In vitro; interaction of protein extracts of cells grown overnight in YP medium containing 2% ethanol with UAS2 (upsteam activating sequence 2) of FBP1 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
W303-1A |
Cells expressing FBP1-lacZ, UAS1-lacZ or UAS2-lacZ (upsteam activating sequences 1/2 of FBP1) grown in YP medium containing 2% ethanol |
PubMed
Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46Tachibana C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Mar;25(6):2138-46 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Growth in glucose derepression conditions (0.05% glucose) |
PubMed
Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15Tachibana C et al., J Biol Chem, 2007 Dec 28;282(52):37308-15 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
0,05% glucose 6h |
PubMed
Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436Biddick RK et al., PLoS One, 2008 Jan 16;3(1):e1436 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Glucose starvation; Exponential cells cultivated in SM with 0.05% glucose |
PubMed
Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24Braun KA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2013 Feb;33(4):712-24 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YP + 0,05% glucose |
PubMed
Han BK et al., J Biol Chem, 2013 Jul 12;288(28):20633-45Han BK et al., J Biol Chem, 2013 Jul 12;288(28):20633-45 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Cells grown in ethanol medium for 15.5 h after shift from YPD |
PubMed
Gasmi N et al., Genetics, 2014 Oct;198(2):547-60Gasmi N et al., Genetics, 2014 Oct;198(2):547-60 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
0.2%Glucose+ 2% ethanol |
PubMed
Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60Parua PK et al., J Biol Chem, 2014 Dec 19;289(51):35542-60 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YP medium + 0.05% glucose |
PubMed
Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464Mehlgarten C et al., PLoS One, 2015 Oct 6;10(10):e0139464 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Grown in glucose and shifted to 3% ethanol for two hours |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |