Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Gcn4p
|
YCL030C
|
PubMed
Li W et al., J Bacteriol, 1992 Jun;174(12):4148-56Li W et al., J Bacteriol, 1992 Jun;174(12):4148-56 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Mountain HA et al., Yeast, 1991 Nov;7(8):781-803Mountain HA et al., Yeast, 1991 Nov;7(8):781-803 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288C |
Minimal medium + methionine |
PubMed
Arndt K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1986;():Arndt K et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1986;(): |
Direct |
DNA footprinting |
N/A |
S288c |
in vitro |
PubMed
Lucchini G et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1984 Jul;4(7):1326-33Lucchini G et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1984 Jul;4(7):1326-33 |
Indirect |
lacZ - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
log phase cells grown in SD medium supplemented with 10 mM 3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Hinnebusch AG et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1983 Sep;80(17):5374-8Hinnebusch AG et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 1983 Sep;80(17):5374-8 |
N/A |
|
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
O'Connell KF et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995;():O'Connell KF et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995;(): |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Yeast cells were grown in SCM lacking aromatic amino acids. From each culture, an initial sample was removed and the remaining portion was adjusted to 1 mM 5-MT, after which additional samples were removed at the times indicated (0, 1h, 2h and 4h) |
PubMed
Mountain HA et al., Mol Microbiol, 1993 Jan;7(2):215-28Mountain HA et al., Mol Microbiol, 1993 Jan;7(2):215-28 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
F384 |
SC medium + aminotriazole |
PubMed
Dudley AM et al., Genetics, 1999 Apr;151(4):1365-78Dudley AM et al., Genetics, 1999 Apr;151(4):1365-78 |
Direct |
lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence |
Positive |
S288c |
SD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Natarajan K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2001 Jul;21(13):4347-68Natarajan K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2001 Jul;21(13):4347-68 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC medium + 100mM 3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Yin Z et al., Proteomics, 2004 Aug;4(8):2425-36Yin Z et al., Proteomics, 2004 Aug;4(8):2425-36 |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC-HIS medium + 3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Kleinschmidt M et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2005 Jun;273(5):382-93Kleinschmidt M et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2005 Jun;273(5):382-93 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Conesa C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Oct;25(19):8631-42Conesa C et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Oct;25(19):8631-42 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
YNN282 |
Constitutive derepression conditions; |
PubMed
Kim SJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Dec;25(24):11171-83Kim SJ et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2005 Dec;25(24):11171-83 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
exposure to sulfometuron methyl |
PubMed
Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50Chua G et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2006 Aug 8;103(32):12045-50 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
N/A |
Cells grown in selective medium supplemented with 2% raffinose before induction with 2% galactose for 3 h |
PubMed
Ernst J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;():Ernst J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;(): |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
PubMed
Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
YNB media |
PubMed
Joo YJ et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2009 Aug;8(8):1268-77Joo YJ et al., Eukaryot Cell, 2009 Aug;8(8):1268-77 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
SC medium w/o histidine |
PubMed
Staschke KA et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911Staschke KA et al., J Biol Chem, 2010 May 28;285(22):16893-911 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
EG328-1A |
RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4 cells treated for 1 h with 200 nM Rapamycin |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
EG328-1A |
RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4DELTAgln3 cells treated for 1 h with 10 mM 3-AT |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
EG328-1A |
RNA prepared from wt and DELTAgcn4DELTAgln3 cells treated for 1 h with 200 nM Rapamycin |
PubMed
Herbig E et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2010 May;30(10):2376-90Herbig E et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2010 May;30(10):2376-90 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
sulfometuron methyl |
PubMed
Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;():Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Knutson BA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2011 Feb;31(4):818-31Knutson BA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 2011 Feb;31(4):818-31 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Galactose |
PubMed
Joo YJ et al., EMBO J, 2011 Mar 2;30(5):859-72Joo YJ et al., EMBO J, 2011 Mar 2;30(5):859-72 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Hernández H et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011 Jan 21;404(3):859-64Hernández H et al., Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2011 Jan 21;404(3):859-64 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
3-aminotriazole |
PubMed
Uluisik I et al., PLoS One, 2011;6(11):e27772Uluisik I et al., PLoS One, 2011;6(11):e27772 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY4741 |
20 mM boric acid for 1h |
PubMed
Brzovic PS et al., Mol Cell, 2011 Dec 23;44(6):942-53Brzovic PS et al., Mol Cell, 2011 Dec 23;44(6):942-53 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
sulfometuron methyl |
PubMed
McIsaac RS et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2013 Feb 1;41(4):e57McIsaac RS et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2013 Feb 1;41(4):e57 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF overexpression |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Lee JC et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2013 Nov;13(7):618-34Lee JC et al., FEMS Yeast Res, 2013 Nov;13(7):618-34 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Cells grown to mid-exponential phase in SD min; addition of 100 mM L-serine |
PubMed
Qiu H et al., Genome Res, 2016 Feb;26(2):211-25Qiu H et al., Genome Res, 2016 Feb;26(2):211-25 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
Cells grown in synthetic complete medium lacking isoleucine and valine (SC-Ilv) to log-phase (OD600 = 0.6–0.8), and SM was added at 1 microg/mL for 30 min to induce Gcn4. |
PubMed
Mittal N et al., Nat Commun, 2017 Sep 6;8(1):457Mittal N et al., Nat Commun, 2017 Sep 6;8(1):457 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Cells grown on YPD and collected in mid-log phase at OD600 of 0.4-0.8 |
PubMed
González J et al., Genetics, 2017 Nov;207(3):975-991González J et al., Genetics, 2017 Nov;207(3):975-991 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
CLA11-700 |
Cells grown to OD600 0.5 on MM with 2% glucose with Glutamine (biosynthetic conditions) |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
CLA11-700 |
Cells grown to OD600 0.5 on MM with 2% glucose with VIL (valine plus isoleucine plus leucine) (catabolic conditions) |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
CLA11-700 |
Cells grown to OD600 0.5 on MM with 2% glucose with GABA |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
CLA11-700 |
MM medium with 2% glucose with glutamine (7 mM) |
PubMed
Rawal Y et al., Mol Cell, 2018 Apr 19;70(2):297-311Rawal Y et al., Mol Cell, 2018 Apr 19;70(2):297-311 |
Direct |
ChIP-seq |
N/A |
BY4741 |
Cells cultured in synthetic complete medium lacking isoleucine and valine (SC-Ilv) to log-phase (OD600=0.6-0.8) supplemented with SM at 1 microg/mL for 25 min to induce Gcn4 synthesis |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
PubMed
Srinivasan R et al., PLoS Genet, 2020 Dec;16(12):e1009252Srinivasan R et al., PLoS Genet, 2020 Dec;16(12):e1009252 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
CEN.PK |
Cells cultured for 1h in MM medium (Yeast Nitrogen Base with glucose as a carbon source) + Met (2mM methionine) |
Indirect |
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
CEN.PK |
Cells cultured for 1h in MM medium (Yeast Nitrogen Base with glucose as a carbon source) + Met (2mM methionine) |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
YPD medium, 25.C |