Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Gcn4p
|
YKL016C
|
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9Workman CT et al., Science, 2006 May 19;312(5776):1054-9 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Ernst J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;():Ernst J et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2007;(): |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
Methylmethane sulfonate stress |
PubMed
Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82Moxley JF et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2009 Apr 21;106(16):6477-82 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
BY4741 |
YNB media |
PubMed
Goh WS et al., PLoS Comput Biol, 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000649Goh WS et al., PLoS Comput Biol, 2010 Jan 22;6(1):e1000649 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;():Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;(): |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Walvekar AS et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Oct 24;29(26):3183-3200Walvekar AS et al., Mol Biol Cell, 2018 Oct 24;29(26):3183-3200 |
Indirect |
RNA-seq - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
CEN.PK |
RM (1% yeast extract, 2% peptone, and 2% lactate) medium grown cells shifted to MM (0.17% yeast nitrogen base without amino acids, 0.5% ammonium sulfate, and 2% lactate) medium with methionine supplementation |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
YPD medium, 25.C |