Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Back to top top

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor		 Target
ORF/Genes		 References Evidence
Code		 Evidence
Experiment		 Association
Type		 Strain Environmental
Condition
Gcr1p YAL038W PubMed external link Nishi K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995 May;15(5):2646-53Nishi K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995 May;15(5):2646-53 Indirect Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant Positive S173-6B YNB glucose medium
PubMed external link Deminoff SJ et al., Genetics, 2001 May;158(1):133-43Deminoff SJ et al., Genetics, 2001 May;158(1):133-43 Indirect Primer extension - wt vs TF mutant Positive SD5 (MATALFA leu2-3,112 hist6 ura4-52 trp1DELTA:: LEU2 gcr2DELTA::ura3 gcr1DELTA4::URA3) YPD
PubMed external link Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative C179-15C-F16 YPAD medium; mid-log phase
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative C179-15C-F16 YPAGL medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Mar;22(4):305-19Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Mar;22(4):305-19 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive C179-15C-F16 mRNA was prepared from the cells grown in YPAGL to an early-log phase.
PubMed external link Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY263 Cells grown in YEP containing either 2% glucose, 3% galactose or 3% raffinose
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
PubMed external link Cha S et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2021 Jan 25;49(2):745-759Cha S et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2021 Jan 25;49(2):745-759 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD media exponential phase
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 YPD medium, 25.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator