Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Gcr1p
|
YDR050C
|
PubMed
Huie MA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2690-700Huie MA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2690-700 |
Direct |
DNA footprinting |
N/A |
S288c |
YP medium supplemented with 2% lactic acid to an optical density (A60) of 1 |
PubMed
Nishi K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995 May;15(5):2646-53Nishi K et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1995 May;15(5):2646-53 |
Indirect |
Northern blot - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S173-6B |
YNB glucose medium |
PubMed
Scott EW et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1993 Jan;13(1):543-50Scott EW et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1993 Jan;13(1):543-50 |
Direct |
lacZ - wt vs mutant promoter sequence |
N/A |
S288c |
N/A |
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
C179-15C-F16 |
YPAD medium; mid-log phase |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
C179-15C-F16 |
YPAGL medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
BY263 |
Cells grown in YEP containing either 2% glucose, 3% galactose or 3% raffinose |
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
PubMed
Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
BY4741 |
YPD medium, 25.C |
PubMed
Chidambaram R et al., J Cell Biochem, 2022 Jun;123(6):1032-1052Chidambaram R et al., J Cell Biochem, 2022 Jun;123(6):1032-1052 |
Direct |
ChIP |
N/A |
BY4741 |
SD medium |