Yeastract
Please fill in here our
user satisfaction survey
Thank you!
YEASTRACT+ INESC-ID IST IBB
Home > Go Back > View Contact/Credits     Tutorial     Help

 

Regulation Reference(s)

The Yeastract team, is actively curating each regulation evidence code, association type and environmental condition.
Transcription
Factor
Target
ORF/Genes
References Evidence
Code
Evidence
Experiment
Association
Type
Strain Environmental
Condition
Gcr1p YOL086C PubMed external link Huie MA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2690-700Huie MA et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1992 Jun;12(6):2690-700 Direct EMSA N/A S288c in vitro
PubMed external link Santangelo GM et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1990 Feb;10(2):859-62Santangelo GM et al., Mol Cell Biol, 1990 Feb;10(2):859-62 Direct DNA footprinting Positive S173-6B SC medium with glucose/pyruvate
PubMed external link López MC et al., J Bacteriol, 2000 Sep;182(17):4970-8López MC et al., J Bacteriol, 2000 Sep;182(17):4970-8 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S150-2B YP medium + 2% lactate + 2% glycerol
PubMed external link Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 Direct Chip-on-chip N/A S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative C179-15C-F16 YPAD medium; mid-log phase
Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Negative C179-15C-F16 YPAGL medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88Barbara KE et al., Mol Genet Genomics, 2007 Feb;277(2):171-88 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY263 Cells grown in YEP containing either 2% glucose, 3% galactose or 3% raffinose
PubMed external link Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 Indirect Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant Positive S288c YPD medium; mid-log phase
PubMed external link Kim D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015 Dec;81(24):8392-401Kim D et al., Appl Environ Microbiol, 2015 Dec;81(24):8392-401 Direct RT-PCR - wt vs mutant promoter sequence Positive S288c 12h growth
PubMed external link Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
Direct ChIP-exo N/A CEN.PK 113-5D Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h
PubMed external link Cha S et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2021 Jan 25;49(2):745-759Cha S et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2021 Jan 25;49(2):745-759 Indirect RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant Positive BY4741 YPD media exponential phase
PubMed external link Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314Rossi MJ et al., Nature, 2021 Apr;592(7853):309-314 Direct ChIP-exo N/A BY4741 YPD medium, 25.C
w3c xhtml validator w3c css validator