Transcription Factor |
Target ORF/Genes |
References |
Evidence Code |
Evidence Experiment |
Association Type |
Strain |
Environmental Condition |
Gcr2p
|
YKL060C
|
PubMed
Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804Lee TI et al., Science, 2002 Oct 25;298(5594):799-804 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104Harbison CT et al., Nature, 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):99-104 |
Direct |
Chip-on-chip |
N/A |
S288c |
SC medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27Sasaki H et al., Yeast, 2005 Jan 30;22(2):111-27 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
YHU3002-8C-F16 |
YPAD medium; mid-log phase |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Negative |
YHU3002-8C-F16 |
YPAGL medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77Reimand J et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2010 Aug;38(14):4768-77 |
Indirect |
Microarray analysis - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;():Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;(): |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
Minimal medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;():Fendt SM et al., Mol Syst Biol, 2010;(): |
Indirect |
Proteomics - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD medium; mid-log phase |
PubMed
Mostovoy Y et al., Genome Biol Evol, 2016 Jun 27;8(6):1748-61Mostovoy Y et al., Genome Biol Evol, 2016 Jun 27;8(6):1748-61 |
Indirect |
RT-PCR - wt vs TF mutant |
Positive |
S288c |
YPD |
PubMed
Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000Holland P et al., Nucleic Acids Res, 2019 Jun 4;47(10):4986-5000 |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in anaerobic glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in ethanol limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in nitrogen limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |
Direct |
ChIP-exo |
N/A |
CEN.PK 113-5D |
Cells were cultivated in chemostats in respiratory glucose limited medium with a dilution rate of 0.1 h-1 at 30.C. Samples were collected after steady state was achieved for 48-60 h |